Wednesday, November 03, 2004
Psst... Matt this post is by:
Jon at 2:42pm on 11/03/2004.
In the wake of the 2004 victory for Dubya and the Republican party, the Main Stream Media uses the term - we are still a divided country…
I think they don’t know what that word means, the word is mandate.
Truth be told, we are a divided country, as far as I know there has been no President that has been elected with 100% of the vote. This country has been divided for its entire history, because we have always allowed the country to vote for its leaders, both locally, in states, and at the federal level. No one (except the occassional unopposed office) has one 100% of the vote.
Looking at the by county map (and USA Today compare 2000/2004 maps) the country has gotten a deeper shade of red. The blue islands, when all blocks have been colored in, will have gotten smaller. Conservative values are winning, the base has learned this year that the rural votes have the power to overcome the big cities if they get out and vote.
The backlash against the party that ignores the growing base of conservatives will only slowly lose any power they have left.
To those in the red states, and those tasting victory. Don’t get cocky. Be true to your values, be true to the offices you hold, and never forget who you work for.
Updates below the fold, click:
Update: Michelle Malkin says:
Yes, the country is divided. Divided between gracious winners and mud-slinging, hypocritical whiners who have nothing else to do now but point to their emotional boo-boos and decry the dirtiness of politics.
Go read the whole
thing.
Update: Jared at Thinklings writes in his post Days of Whine and Poses:
The Left has reaped the whirlwind it started.
He also thinks the next few years it will be entertaining to watch the lefties deconstruct more. Me, not so much the last three have been pretty painful… I hope they are faster learners…
Update: Other blogs that I frequently read are using the same graphic:
Eric @ Fireant Gazzette:
Granted, since we’re a republic of states, those state lines really are meaningful; I’m not trying to minimize that fact or argue otherwise. This is just a different perspective than what we usually see.
Daniel @ Behind the Wall of Sleep:
Do you still see a fortress? I do not; far from it. Instead, I think this shows how integrated we are, Republicans and Democrats, all mixed-up together. You want to know what else? I bet if you went a little deeper, and looked at the voting district results, you would see even more mingling. And, if the data were available, at a house-by-house level, or a voter-by-voter level, you would have to admit that we live cheek-and-jowl, side-by-side, right next to one another.
It’s not a fortress, sir. It’s a nation.
To buttress Daniel’s point, goto CNN’s Election map. This map intrigued me by its presentation of the county by county totals. You have to click through to the states, and then you’ll see a gradient view of the strength’s of each candidates total. A strong Bush county will be a dark red, and a strong Kerry county will be a dark blue. You can also see an individual county by county ‘strength’ map which just shows the color gradient for one candidate. I’d love to see the final version of this map at the country level using the gradients by county, instead of the red/blue map.
click to hide more...